Archive for the ‘Pest & Vermin Control’ Category

Rink Rats: Simple Mistakes by the Rangers – New Yorker (blog)

The Rangers began their recovery on a luxuriously sneaky fake by Marian Gaborik. He skated down the right side and, when the goalie faced him squarely, dropped his shoulder to shoot, but stopped instead, and passed the puck to Brad Richards, who was a step ahead of the Washington defenseman and looking at nothing but twine.

The end, however, was delivered by Alex Ovechkin, who had been taunted by the Garden crowd chanting “Ovie Sucks,” a brainless phrase typical of much of the Garden crowd’s boorish behavior over the years. (Forgive me, I had to get that out.) I do like the chant they reserve for a referee who annoys them—it has a retributive glory—but it is undignified to taunt a visiting player so coarsely. Louts is what it makes us New Yorkers sound like, and anyway it appeared to inspire Ovechkin. After scoring, he ridiculed the audience by holding his glove to his ear. For a reason not known publicly, Dale Hunter, the Capitals’ coach, has played Ovechkin sparingly. The Kremlinology is that Ovechkin can be selfish and sometimes thoughtless and so is a liability in a closely contested game. When you need a goal, you employ him. Very few players can score from the blue line on a wrist shot, as Ovechkin did. Lundqvist, in a gnomic sort of statement, said, “I saw the puck, then I didn’t see it, then I saw it.”

What struck many people was that the Capitals had more or less played the Rangers’ game. Having noticed in the first game that the Rangers had succeeded with long passes to forwards in full stride at mid-ice, they blocked the passing lanes and forced the Rangers to move the puck in short and somewhat static lines. This is wearying and frustrating, and, while the Rangers managed a number of opportunities by means of foot speed and aggression, they lacked the hands to finish them. They hit two goalposts, as the Capitals had in the first game, but hitting a goalpost often means the goalie played the shot so effectively that nothing was left for the puck to hit but the iron.

Is there hope? Indeed. All year the Rangers have recovered quickly from losses, and one of the appealing aspects of this team’s persona is that they do not relent.

Photograph: Cal Sport Media/AP Images.

Rink Rats: Simple Mistakes by the Rangers – New Yorker (blog)
http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&usg=AFQjCNHzC5ox9rf0GJrtA_BnbjYmms3SGg&url=http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/sportingscene/2012/05/rink-rats-simple-mistakes-for-the-rangers.html
http://news.google.com/news?q=rats&output=rss
rats – Google News
Google News
http://www.gstatic.com/news/img/logo/en_us/news.gif

Rat Bite Study Shows Rodent Owes ‘Success’ To Gnawing, Chewing Abilities – Huffington Post

Rat

By: Wynne Parry, LiveScience Senior Writer
Published: 04/27/2012 05:21 PM EDT on LiveScience

Rats and their close relatives, including mice, make up nearly a quarter of known mammal species. New research offers a clue to these rodents’ success: their bite.

Rodents have evolved two feeding modes, gnawing with their incisors and chewing with their molars farther back in their mouths. However, they cannot do both at the same time.

Some, such as squirrels and beavers, have specialized in gnawing. Others, such as guinea pigs and porcupines, have specialized in chewing. Others, a group called myomorphs that includes rats and mice, have taken the middle road by staying flexible and adapted to doing both at different times.

To find out whether rats could out-bite other rodents, a team of scientists from the United Kingdom, France and Japan, used computer models to simulate the bites of rodents. They also wanted to find out whether it was the rat’s skull shape or its jaw muscles that gave it an extraordinary bite; so they created virtual animals with characteristics from different biters, such as a rat skull with squirrel muscles.

Not surprisingly, they found that squirrels can more efficiently apply force with their bite muscles when gnawing than can guinea pigs, while guinea pigs can chew with their molars more efficiently than squirrels. This makes sense, considering that squirrels gnaw on a diet of nuts and seeds, while guinea pigs eat grasses.

But rats turned out to be more efficient at gnawing and chewing than the other rodents.

The results showed “the way rat muscles have adapted over time has increased their ability to chew more effectively than a guinea pig and gnaw better than a squirrel, even though these two species are specialists in these kinds of jaw movements,” study researcher Nathan Jeffery of the University of Liverpool said in a statement. “This goes some way to explaining why rats and mice are so successful, as well as destructive, as their versatile feeding behavior allows them to eat through a wide variety of materials efficiently.”

The researchers detailed their work yesterday (April 27) in the journal PLoS ONE.

You can follow LiveScience writer Wynne Parry on Twitter @Wynne_Parry. Follow LiveScience for the latest in science news and discoveries on Twitter @livescience and on Facebook.

Copyright 2012 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Also on HuffPost:



“;
var coords = [-5, -72];
// display fb-bubble
FloatingPrompt.embed(this, html, undefined, ‘top’, {fp_intersects:1, timeout_remove:2000,ignore_arrow: true, width:236, add_xy:coords, class_name: ‘clear-overlay’});
});

Rat Bite Study Shows Rodent Owes ‘Success’ To Gnawing, Chewing Abilities – Huffington Post
http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&usg=AFQjCNGNslYgfKg2f-VnTyIDD8VQv4shAA&url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/28/rats-study-rodent-world_n_1461316.html
http://news.google.com/news?q=rats&output=rss
rats – Google News
Google News
http://www.gstatic.com/news/img/logo/en_us/news.gif

Rat Bite Study Shows Rodent Owes ‘Success’ To Gnawing, Chewing Abilities – Huffington Post

Rat

By: Wynne Parry, LiveScience Senior Writer
Published: 04/27/2012 05:21 PM EDT on LiveScience

Rats and their close relatives, including mice, make up nearly a quarter of known mammal species. New research offers a clue to these rodents’ success: their bite.

Rodents have evolved two feeding modes, gnawing with their incisors and chewing with their molars farther back in their mouths. However, they cannot do both at the same time.

Some, such as squirrels and beavers, have specialized in gnawing. Others, such as guinea pigs and porcupines, have specialized in chewing. Others, a group called myomorphs that includes rats and mice, have taken the middle road by staying flexible and adapted to doing both at different times.

To find out whether rats could out-bite other rodents, a team of scientists from the United Kingdom, France and Japan, used computer models to simulate the bites of rodents. They also wanted to find out whether it was the rat’s skull shape or its jaw muscles that gave it an extraordinary bite; so they created virtual animals with characteristics from different biters, such as a rat skull with squirrel muscles.

Not surprisingly, they found that squirrels can more efficiently apply force with their bite muscles when gnawing than can guinea pigs, while guinea pigs can chew with their molars more efficiently than squirrels. This makes sense, considering that squirrels gnaw on a diet of nuts and seeds, while guinea pigs eat grasses.

But rats turned out to be more efficient at gnawing and chewing than the other rodents.

The results showed “the way rat muscles have adapted over time has increased their ability to chew more effectively than a guinea pig and gnaw better than a squirrel, even though these two species are specialists in these kinds of jaw movements,” study researcher Nathan Jeffery of the University of Liverpool said in a statement. “This goes some way to explaining why rats and mice are so successful, as well as destructive, as their versatile feeding behavior allows them to eat through a wide variety of materials efficiently.”

The researchers detailed their work yesterday (April 27) in the journal PLoS ONE.

You can follow LiveScience writer Wynne Parry on Twitter @Wynne_Parry. Follow LiveScience for the latest in science news and discoveries on Twitter @livescience and on Facebook.

Copyright 2012 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Also on HuffPost:



“;
var coords = [-5, -72];
// display fb-bubble
FloatingPrompt.embed(this, html, undefined, ‘top’, {fp_intersects:1, timeout_remove:2000,ignore_arrow: true, width:236, add_xy:coords, class_name: ‘clear-overlay’});
});

Rat Bite Study Shows Rodent Owes ‘Success’ To Gnawing, Chewing Abilities – Huffington Post
http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&usg=AFQjCNGNslYgfKg2f-VnTyIDD8VQv4shAA&url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/28/rats-study-rodent-world_n_1461316.html
http://news.google.com/news?q=rats&output=rss
rats – Google News
Google News
http://www.gstatic.com/news/img/logo/en_us/news.gif

Rat Bite Study Shows Rodent Owes ‘Success’ To Gnawing, Chewing Abilities – Huffington Post

Rat

By: Wynne Parry, LiveScience Senior Writer
Published: 04/27/2012 05:21 PM EDT on LiveScience

Rats and their close relatives, including mice, make up nearly a quarter of known mammal species. New research offers a clue to these rodents’ success: their bite.

Rodents have evolved two feeding modes, gnawing with their incisors and chewing with their molars farther back in their mouths. However, they cannot do both at the same time.

Some, such as squirrels and beavers, have specialized in gnawing. Others, such as guinea pigs and porcupines, have specialized in chewing. Others, a group called myomorphs that includes rats and mice, have taken the middle road by staying flexible and adapted to doing both at different times.

To find out whether rats could out-bite other rodents, a team of scientists from the United Kingdom, France and Japan, used computer models to simulate the bites of rodents. They also wanted to find out whether it was the rat’s skull shape or its jaw muscles that gave it an extraordinary bite; so they created virtual animals with characteristics from different biters, such as a rat skull with squirrel muscles.

Not surprisingly, they found that squirrels can more efficiently apply force with their bite muscles when gnawing than can guinea pigs, while guinea pigs can chew with their molars more efficiently than squirrels. This makes sense, considering that squirrels gnaw on a diet of nuts and seeds, while guinea pigs eat grasses.

But rats turned out to be more efficient at gnawing and chewing than the other rodents.

The results showed “the way rat muscles have adapted over time has increased their ability to chew more effectively than a guinea pig and gnaw better than a squirrel, even though these two species are specialists in these kinds of jaw movements,” study researcher Nathan Jeffery of the University of Liverpool said in a statement. “This goes some way to explaining why rats and mice are so successful, as well as destructive, as their versatile feeding behavior allows them to eat through a wide variety of materials efficiently.”

The researchers detailed their work yesterday (April 27) in the journal PLoS ONE.

You can follow LiveScience writer Wynne Parry on Twitter @Wynne_Parry. Follow LiveScience for the latest in science news and discoveries on Twitter @livescience and on Facebook.

Copyright 2012 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Also on HuffPost:



“;
var coords = [-5, -72];
// display fb-bubble
FloatingPrompt.embed(this, html, undefined, ‘top’, {fp_intersects:1, timeout_remove:2000,ignore_arrow: true, width:236, add_xy:coords, class_name: ‘clear-overlay’});
});

Rat Bite Study Shows Rodent Owes ‘Success’ To Gnawing, Chewing Abilities – Huffington Post
http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&usg=AFQjCNGNslYgfKg2f-VnTyIDD8VQv4shAA&url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/28/rats-study-rodent-world_n_1461316.html
http://news.google.com/news?q=rats&output=rss
rats – Google News
Google News
http://www.gstatic.com/news/img/logo/en_us/news.gif

Mike Fay’s Pitcairn Journal: Rat Patrol – National Geographic

Note: Due to the unfortunate discovery made by Mike Fay on 27 March, extra time was taken to communicate with the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds before publishing his findings. We now recommence with the posting of the remaining entries from Mike’s Pitcairn Islands Expedition Journal in the proper sequence. You can follow the whole series here.

 

By Mike Fay, NG Explorer-in-Residence

28 March 2012

Since the rat sighting of yesterday, I decided to walk night transects to see a second one, to get some gauge on the numbers that might be out there.  I was up at 5:00 AM and headed up the hill after my now traditional cup of cold Nescafe and powdered milk.  I scaled the plateau face and was soon cruising on the de-ratification team transect.  I got to 500 meters: no rats, went straight to where I saw the rat yesterday evening: nothing, then went on the cross transect at 500 meters: no rats.

On my track back I was still on rat patrol, but the crakes would be awake and feeding now.  It seems that they are crepuscular.  They seem to feed for only a few hours in the morning and maybe 3 to 4 hours in the evening and that’s it.  I saw two crakes on the trail back, but both flitted away into the deep underbrush so I didn’t get any good observations.   I headed back to camp around 9 and had a proper breakfast of Chinese peanut butter and jelly mixed with the distinct aroma of the garlic and coriander spread whose jar it was in.

I decided to go back up the hill and stay for the rest of the day until night to be able to see lorikeets and fruit pigeons and then continue on into the evening and night for crakes and rats.  I pitched up at 700 meters and sat down just where I had seen the rat last night.  I put my eyes on the spot in the rubble where the rat had fled to and put a small piece of peanut butter and jelly there to entice him.  I was soon fast asleep.  I needed a snooze for sure, because that coral rubble is not soft.

When I awoke, I saw that nobody had been by to eat the PB&J.  I headed south on the trail and had a couple of nice encounters with fruit pigeons.  No lorikeets up here today.   I re-ran the circuit to the east and took the first right.  It got to be around 4:00 PM and just as I was thinking I might see a crake, there a beauty appeared in front of me.

I startled him a bit and he jumped and fled into the underbrush, but soon he was back.  I still didn’t have any good video of them because they jump around so much, but I was intent.  He settled down and I started getting some great views of him feeding.  Unlike chickens these crakes don’t scratch the earth with their feet but flick leaves with their beaks and quickly eat every little invertebrate that is revealed.

Judging by the number of things this bird picked up at every turn of a leaf it was pretty obvious that they don’t suffer for food here, at least at this season.

Soon there was a burst in the branches above and the crake popped off and was gone.  I looked up and there was a fruit pigeon who decided to join the action.  Of course, now instead of being happy to see another fruit pigeon I was scolding him for making too much noise.  The crake was now looking up as if a raptor was after him, even though there are no raptors here.  Every time the pigeon clapped his wings I would loose the crake.  After an hour I lost this bird and moved on down the trail.  Soon thereafter I saw another but he ran into the underbrush not to be seen again.

The sun started to go down.  I slapped on my headlamp and redid the circuit on rat patrol: nothing.   I started back down to camp and right on the trail was a Henderson petrel just kind of sitting there.  She was all alone.  I reached the edge of the cliff and there was our ship, the Claymore II, parked right out front yet so far from us.  Being isolated on Henderson gives you a huge sense of being quite alone on the planet.

 

Addendum: The Pitcairn Islands Government and the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB), the two partners in the island restoration project, are mobilizing a trip to Henderson in response to this sighting. Their aim is to try to confirm rat presence and species, obtain genetic samples, determine whether a small number of rats survived the eradication operation or have since been introduced to the island, and to learn as much as they can about any extant rat population. They will also assess the feasibility of carrying out a hand-baiting around the area of the rat sighting and do this if possible. In the longer term, the operation will have bought precious time for Henderson’s wildlife. Millions of pairs of seabirds have been lost from Henderson since rats were introduced to the island, and the team are determined to continue their work to restore this remarkable World Heritage Site and save the Henderson petrel from its slide towards extinction.

 

More From Pitcairn Islands Expedition

Read All Mike Fay’s Journal Entries

Read All Pitcairn Islands Expedition Blogs

 

Mike Fay’s Pitcairn Journal: Rat Patrol – National Geographic
http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&fd=R&usg=AFQjCNFN0F8ZyHsnqezdGvOOytEJxZVwKg&url=http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2012/04/28/mike-fays-pitcairn-journal-rat-patrol/
http://news.google.com/news?q=rats&output=rss
rats – Google News
Google News
http://www.gstatic.com/news/img/logo/en_us/news.gif


Archives
rss feed
Blog Traffic

Pages

Pages|Hits |Unique

  • Last 24 hours: 1,573
  • Last 7 days: 12,623
  • Last 30 days: 58,569
  • Online now: 12

Switch to our mobile site